Parole representation: What an Attorney May Do

From time to time, I am consulted by a person wanting me to assist them in getting a family member out of prison.  Specifically, they have an upcoming parole hearing and they want to know what I can and will do as their attorney.  Below are the steps that I take when working through a parole hearing, where the inmate's release is pending:

  • Review the client's case (reason they are in prison)
  • Obtain and review prison records: disciplinary and grievance records
  • Meet with the Client face-to-face
  • Interview the Client
  • Speak with family and friends to make living and transportation arrangements (upon release)
  • Create arguments to justify parole
  • Explain and answer points discouraging parole
  • Review the Client's written argument and parole plan
  • Submit the argument with an interview request to speak with the lead voter on the parole board of the panel reviewing the case
  • Speak with the parole panel members who vote on the parole matter and present a verbal presenation to the parole board members voting on the case
  • Ask for an immediate release and discuss with the parole board members conditions that they may want implemented to approve the parole
  • If the vote is for parole, track the case throughout the remaining steps until the parole certificate is printed
  • If the vote is against parole, discover the reason(s) for the denial and provide any follow-up parole presentation that is necessary for free when the next review occurs

Of course, there is no guarantee that a person will be paroled and the amount of time that a person must serve in prison before being eligible varies.  However, these are the basic steps that outline the process for preparing a parole case.

Fees vary depending on the amount of witnesses and hours of work to be spent on the matter.  However, like my other criminal defense practice, I work on a flat-fee basis.

 

Dirty Urinalysis According to Probation but Private Lab says I'm Clean!

Things like this do not seem possible and one would hope that the situation never arises, in fact they are not supposed to occur!  Aren't probation departments supposed to be objective keepers of files and the "watchers" of those convicted of some sort degree of criminal offense.  I thought that probation officers were to help their clients to make better decisions and to allow them to "learn" from their mistake(s)... not deliberately set them up to fail.

I thought so too until I heard about a conversation where a probationer was accused of providing a dirty urinalysis (UA) for a given type of illegal substance but that person actually had reports from private labs showing that he was not only clean from all illegal substances but from the one alleged.

What would something like this mean? What could he do? Clearly, if he has to fight the system to prevent his probation from being revoked that is an option, but should it come to that point?!

Again, how could the sample show up as "dirty" unless someone is tampering with the specimens!

But that would never happen.......................................... or would it?